Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151535›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

The intersection of neuroscience, socioeconomic status, and preterm birth.

Alexandra F Bonthrone, Steven P Miller, James P Boardman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra F BonthroneResearch Department of Early Life Imaging, Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Steven P MillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
James P BoardmanCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. james.boardman@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-8960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm birth is a leading cause of brain dysmaturation and neurocognitive impairment in childhood. While both dysmaturation and adverse outcomes are often attributed to low gestational age and PTB-associated risk factors such as chorioamnionitis, immune dysregulation, suboptimal nutrition, and common co-morbidities, recent studies suggest socioeconomic inequalities also play an important role. In this review, we summarize current etiological evidence linking socioeconomic status with i) brain injury/dysmaturation defined using magnetic resonance imaging, and ii) cognitive and behavioral outcomes, in very preterm children from birth to five years. We consider the mechanisms that may embed socioeconomic status in the development of children who were born preterm, including in response to prevalent brain injuries. We discuss the potential role of access to cognitive, social, and economic resources for attenuating the effects of social disadvantage and suggest targets for future research and policy change. IMPACT: Social gradients are strong determinants of neurodevelopmental outcomes after preterm birth. Social disadvantage is associated with brain structure and connectivity in preterm infants. Improving outcomes after preterm birth is likely to require mitigating social disadvantage in the perinatal period and early childhood, as well as reducing medical risks linked to atypical development.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.