ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimating maximum pressure-flow scour depth around cylindrical bridge piers using a theoretical model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The significant impacts of pressure-flow scour have emerged as a critical concern in recent decades, largely due to the severe environmental effects of climate change. Earlier research primarily concentrated on estimating the maximum pressure-flow scour depth around cylindrical bridge piers through dimensional analysis and theoretical approaches. However, the reliability of some previous equations for predicting the scour depth has been questioned. This paper introduces two new theoretical methods to enhance the predictive accuracy of pressure-flow scour depth around cylindrical piers. Using the existing equations for maximum scour depth along the vertical jet centerlines, the first method adapts these principles to develop an equation for the pressure-flow scour around cylindrical bridge piers. The second method is grounded in phenomenological turbulence theory. It employs two distinct equations for calculating the angle and velocity of the combined jet, as well as the effective depth under the bridge deck. The equations formulated in this research have been calibrated using datasets that span sufficiently long-time intervals. The results indicate that both methods can accurately predict the maximum pressure-flow scour depth at equilibrium time. Notably, statistical indicators suggest that the second method offers significantly better results compared to the first and previous equations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.