ArticleScientific reports2026
An explainable AI framework integrating machine and deep learning models for multi-species DNA functional group classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA functional group classification across species plays a crucial role in understanding genetic diversity, evolutionary relationships and biological function. The increasing availability of genomic data has led to the use of machine learning and deep learning methods for identifying functional patterns within DNA sequences. However, the interpretability of these models remains a challenge in validating biological relevance. This study presents an explainable AI framework that integrates machine learning and deep learning models for multi-species DNA functional group classification. The functional groups represent gene families, including transcription factors and kinases, and the classification task is carried out on Human, Chimpanzee, Dog, and a custom Combined dataset merging sequences from all three species. The DNA sequences were transformed into k-mers to capture local compositional patterns before training. Following a controlled hyperparameter tuning strategy, the Logistic Regression model consistently achieved the highest MCC and F1-scores across all evaluated datasets. While deep learning architectures captured longer motif dependencies, classical models showed stronger generalization across species. A multi-level XAI analysis was conducted using techniques such as Feature Importance, Saliency Maps, Integrated Gradients, GradientSHAP, and Attention Heatmaps. The analysis identified consensus motifs, cross-dataset and cross-model motif patterns, and evaluated model stability based on motif overlap and Jaccard similarity, as well as model fidelity based on performance drops after masking model-identified motifs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.