Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Unlocking the financing potential of forest-based carbon assets: a valuation framework for pledge lending under uncertainty in China.

Yan Zhang, Jingyu Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yan ZhangDepartment School of Economics, Yunnan University, Kunming, China. yz333@cam.ac.uk.
Jingyu ZhangDepartment School of Economics, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.

Funding

British Academy PF170136State Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Intelligent Manufacturing System QZKF2025-05Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects of Science and Technology 202401AT070472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest-based carbon assets are increasingly proposed as collateral for green credit, yet a central problem remains unresolved: a higher collateral valuation does not necessarily translate into greater lendable value. Here we develop a contract-consistent framework for pricing forest-based carbon collateral under uncertainty and apply it to the Ning'er afforestation case in Yunnan, China, covering 51,365 mu and 719,680 t [Formula: see text] e of expected carbon assets. The framework combines weekly carbon-price forecasting from thin and irregular China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) trading data with threshold-based option valuation and a lender-oriented pledge-rate equation anchored to the observed three-year loan structure. Using weekly pre-loan transactions from 31 August 2018 to 30 September 2022, we show that incorporating uncertainty and timing flexibility raises the option-adjusted collateral value to CNY 71.87 million. However, once effective deliverability, downside protection and prudential threshold calibration are imposed, the model-implied lower-bound pledgeable amount is only CNY 5.92 million, below the realised loan of CNY 12 million. Sensitivity analysis further shows that financing capacity is jointly shaped by carbon price, effective deliverability, volatility identification and threshold calibration. Our results show that valuing forest-based carbon assets for lending is not a single-stage asset-pricing problem, but a constrained translation problem between economic collateral value and lender-recognised lendable value.

Indexed as

Carbon asset valuationForest-based carbon assetsPledge lendingReal options and forecasting modellingSustainable finance innovation

Identifiers

PMID42151487
PMCPMC13294374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.