ArticleScientific reports2026
Unlocking the financing potential of forest-based carbon assets: a valuation framework for pledge lending under uncertainty in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forest-based carbon assets are increasingly proposed as collateral for green credit, yet a central problem remains unresolved: a higher collateral valuation does not necessarily translate into greater lendable value. Here we develop a contract-consistent framework for pricing forest-based carbon collateral under uncertainty and apply it to the Ning'er afforestation case in Yunnan, China, covering 51,365 mu and 719,680 t [Formula: see text] e of expected carbon assets. The framework combines weekly carbon-price forecasting from thin and irregular China Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) trading data with threshold-based option valuation and a lender-oriented pledge-rate equation anchored to the observed three-year loan structure. Using weekly pre-loan transactions from 31 August 2018 to 30 September 2022, we show that incorporating uncertainty and timing flexibility raises the option-adjusted collateral value to CNY 71.87 million. However, once effective deliverability, downside protection and prudential threshold calibration are imposed, the model-implied lower-bound pledgeable amount is only CNY 5.92 million, below the realised loan of CNY 12 million. Sensitivity analysis further shows that financing capacity is jointly shaped by carbon price, effective deliverability, volatility identification and threshold calibration. Our results show that valuing forest-based carbon assets for lending is not a single-stage asset-pricing problem, but a constrained translation problem between economic collateral value and lender-recognised lendable value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.