ArticleCommunications engineering2026
Microfluidic platforms for probing spontaneous functional recovery in hierarchically modular neuronal networks.
Article in Communications engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inherent capacity to flexibly reorganize after injury is a hallmark of brain networks, with recent studies suggesting that the functional consequences of damage are strongly influenced by the network's nonrandom connectivity. However, experimental platforms that enable bottom-up investigations of the structure-function relationships underlying damage and recovery processes remain limited. Here, we used polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic devices to construct hierarchically modular neuronal networks that mimic the topological features of the mammalian cortex. Laser microdissection was employed to selectively sever intermodular connections, enabling controlled damage to either hub or peripheral connections. Damage to hub connections leads to delayed recovery, requiring more than three days for correlations to re-emerge. Contrarily, peripheral damage resulted in faster recovery. Repeated injury to neuronal networks further revealed that recovery occurs through both new pathway formation and restoration of originals. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the intrinsic self-repair capacity of living neuronal networks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.