Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cortical activity and functional organisation during ocular pursuit is affected by concurrent upper limb movement.

Lénaïc Borot, Ruth Ogden, Simon J Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lénaïc BorotSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Ruth OgdenSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Simon J BennettSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. S.J.Bennett@ljmu.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking a moving object with the eyes involves sensory-motor and cognitive processes, and is supported by a wide network of cortical areas. We investigated if cortical activity and network organisation in young adults are influenced by the availability of retinal input when pursuing a moving object, and whether this is modulated by extra-retinal input from concurrent upper limb movement. As expected, we found a decrease in average eye velocity, and increase in saccadic displacement, when the moving object was occluded, as well as a general facilitatory effect of oculo-manual tracking. We also found decreased activity in prefrontal and frontal cortex during oculo-manual compared to ocular tracking when the moving object was occluded. Following a short period of practice in the oculo-manual condition without occlusion, there was an increase in activity in prefrontal, parietal and visual cortex during ocular tracking. These findings could indicate how extra-retinal input during oculo-manual tracking reduces the need for attentional and predictive processes to extrapolate and pursue the occluded object. This is an important step in better understanding impaired oculo-manual coordination (e.g., age-related decline), potentially informing the development of more effective tasks for differential diagnosis and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Upper ExtremityAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMovementPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42151448
PMCPMC13376519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.