ArticleCommunications psychology2026
Context-dependent interaction between goal-directed and habitual control under time pressure.
Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Action repetition biases choice in context-dependent decision-making.Communications psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current theories of habitual behaviour assume that habits and goal-directed actions are controlled by two separate but interacting systems. However, it is not clear how these systems interact when actions must be made under time pressure. We use a task that induces habitual action sequences while requiring participants to perform goal-directed actions that are either congruent or incongruent with the habit. This task allows for the concurrent measurement of goal-directed and habitual behaviour, permitting a nuanced analysis of the interaction between these two control modes in a sample of 60 participants (30 male and 30 female). Using computational modelling, we find that models in which habit influence depends on the number of repetitions explain participant behaviour better than models assuming constant habit strength. We further show that participants modulate their use of the habit depending on the context: they selectively inhibited the habit when it was incongruent with their explicit goals and exploited it when the two were congruent. Drift-diffusion modelling of choices and reaction times shows a shift in response-bias when habits and goals align. Together, our results indicate that habitual and goal-directed actions interact in a context-dependent manner allowing for the adaptive allocation of proactive and reactive control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.