ArticleNature methods2026
From possibility to precision in macromolecular ensemble prediction.
Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atomic resolution ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with Alphafold.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ten rules for a structural bioinformatic analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins and other macromolecules exist as dynamic ensembles of interconverting conformations essential for catalysis, allosteric regulation and molecular recognition. While AI tools like AlphaFold have revolutionized static structure prediction, they cannot yet capture conformational ensembles. Progress toward the next-generation ensemble predictors is limited by the lack of accurate, high-resolution ground-truth data at the scale required for training and validation-no single experimental technique fully resolves the atomistic complexity of conformational landscapes, and challenges remain in defining, representing, comparing and validating structural ensembles. Here, we outline the infrastructure and methodological advances needed to overcome these barriers. We highlight emerging strategies for integrating heterogeneous experimental data into unified ensemble encoding representations and leveraging these to build benchmarks and ensemble-specific validation protocols. We also discuss how ensemble prediction will drive an interactive cycle of experimental and computational innovation, ultimately moving structural biology beyond static snapshots toward a dynamic understanding of the full complexity of molecular behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42151395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.