Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151395›Full record

ArticleNature methods2026

From possibility to precision in macromolecular ensemble prediction.

Stephanie A Wankowicz, Massimiliano Bonomi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ten rules for a structural bioinformatic analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephanie A WankowiczMolecular Physiology and Biophysics, Biochemistry, Center for Applied AI in Protein Dynamics, Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. stephanie@wankowiczlab.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4225-7459
Massimiliano BonomiInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3528, Computational Structural Biology Unit, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7321-0004

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Societal Challenges | H2020 Society (H2020 Societal Challenges - Europe in a Changing World - Inclusive, Innovative and Reflective Societies) 101086685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins and other macromolecules exist as dynamic ensembles of interconverting conformations essential for catalysis, allosteric regulation and molecular recognition. While AI tools like AlphaFold have revolutionized static structure prediction, they cannot yet capture conformational ensembles. Progress toward the next-generation ensemble predictors is limited by the lack of accurate, high-resolution ground-truth data at the scale required for training and validation-no single experimental technique fully resolves the atomistic complexity of conformational landscapes, and challenges remain in defining, representing, comparing and validating structural ensembles. Here, we outline the infrastructure and methodological advances needed to overcome these barriers. We highlight emerging strategies for integrating heterogeneous experimental data into unified ensemble encoding representations and leveraging these to build benchmarks and ensemble-specific validation protocols. We also discuss how ensemble prediction will drive an interactive cycle of experimental and computational innovation, ultimately moving structural biology beyond static snapshots toward a dynamic understanding of the full complexity of molecular behavior.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMacromolecular SubstancesModels, MolecularProteinsPrediction AlgorithmsProtein ConformationMacromolecular SubstancesProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.