Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151384›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2026

Regulation of immune checkpoint molecules in cancer immune evasion and therapy.

Cansu Eris, Cheng Zu, Yanling Xiao, Michael Platten, Chong Sun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cansu Eris *Division of Immune Regulation in Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Cheng Zu *Division of Immune Regulation in Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3471-4338
Yanling XiaoDepartment of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-1709
Michael PlattenDKTK Clinical Cooperation Unit (CCU) Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. m.platten@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4746-887X
Chong SunDivision of Immune Regulation in Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. c.sun@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9008-2158

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint molecules are essential regulators of immune homeostasis, maintaining the balance between activation and tolerance. In cancer, tumours exploit checkpoint pathways to suppress antitumour immunity and promote progression. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly those that target the clinically validated PDL1-PD1 and CTLA4 axes, has transformed cancer therapy, and the LAG3 axis has recently entered clinical practice, yet most patients experience limited or transient benefit, often because the checkpoint molecules become dysregulated. Here, we examine how multilayered regulatory mechanisms operating at the genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels collectively shape checkpoint abundance and function in tumour and immune cells. We further connect these regulatory processes to immune evasion and therapeutic resistance and highlight how this knowledge informs biomarker development and mechanism-guided strategies to improve immunotherapy outcomes.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.