ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of GCNT3 as a glycometabolism-associated biomarker in endometrial cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) incidence is increasing, with diabetes mellitus (DM) elevating EC risk. This study investigates the glycometabolism-associated gene GCNT3 in EC. We systematically integrated pancreatic tissue DM datasets (GSE25724, GSE76896, and GSE95849) with RNA sequencing data from the TCGA-UCEC cohort. Our analytical strategy incorporated a comprehensive bioinformatics workflow, primarily including differential gene expression profiling, survival outcome modeling, functional enrichment analysis, and detailed immune infiltration assessment. Three machine-learning algorithms, including LASSO regression, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), and Random Forest, were applied for feature selection. To reduce overestimation from using the same discovery cohort alone, the EC cohort was randomly divided into a training set and a test set at a ratio of 7:3. Feature selection was performed in the training set, with 5-fold cross-validation used for LASSO and SVM-RFE, and model discrimination and decision-curve performance were subsequently evaluated in the independent test set. Finally, clinical validation was performed by immunohistochemical examination of 80 EC tissues and 40 histologically confirmed normal endometrial control tissues to validate GCNT3 expression differences and clarify its potential biological significance in EC. Molecular docking studies were then conducted to explore potential binding interactions between GCNT3 and the selected candidate drugs Afatinib and Selumetinib. GCNT3 was upregulated in EC. In unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, higher GCNT3 expression was associated with improved overall survival and disease-free survival. In multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, tumor grade, and tumor stage, GCNT3 remained an independent prognostic factor in EC. High GCNT3 expression was also associated with lower tumor grade and earlier stage, together with distinct immune infiltration patterns. High GCNT3 expression was associated with lower predicted IC50 values for Afatinib and Selumetinib. Molecular docking suggested potential binding interactions between GCNT3 and these agents, supporting a possible association between GCNT3 expression and differential drug responsiveness. GCNT3 is a potential biomarker for EC prognosis and therapy, showing consistent associations with glycometabolic signatures and the immune microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.