ArticleScientific reports2026
Cardiac activity monitoring for the heart rate classification with enhanced BiLSTM model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac activity monitoring is important for assessing cardiovascular status and supporting computational analysis of heart-rate pattern variations from wearable PPG signals. The development of wearable devices and public datasets has made continuous and noninvasive monitoring more viable. However, there are still problems that may impair the effectiveness of the technique such as motion artifact, signal noises, changes in the physiological states, and differences in sensor quality. Moreover, it is hard to create algorithms that would be highly accurate in the real-life scenario and would be able to generalize among diverse populations. These problems should be resolved in order to produce reliable, robust, and computationally consistent heart-rate pattern classification frameworks. Hence, this research paper proposes a cardiac activity monitoring-based Heart Rate Classification (CAM-HRC) model with the help of an intelligent deep learning approach. The data was first obtained on the standard benchmark sources referred to as WildPPG: A Real-World photoplethysmography (PPG) Dataset. Preprocessing at the baseline level in the collected data was obtained through data cleaning and normalization techniques. The Temporal Attentive U-Net (TAU) method was used to divide these pre-processed data into segments. These features were then extracted from segmented data with Self-Supervised Multi-Encoder Autoencoder (MEAE) method. The last stage was the classification of these extracted features with CAM-HRC model and the newly added Enhanced Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (EBiLSTM). The parameter tweaking of the traditional BiLSTM model was done with the help of a nature-inspired optimization algorithm known as Salamander Optimization Algorithm (SOA). The objective function of the whole process of proposed CAM-HRC model is taken as accuracy maximization. The suggested EBiLSTM-SOA model will divide the final heart rate output into four classes, normal heart rate, Tachycardia, Bradycardia and Rhythm Irregularity. The accuracy and specificity of the proposed EBiLSTM-SOA model of the CAM-HRC are 24.70 per cent and 19.44 per cent higher than the other methods of traditional approaches, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.