Observational studyScientific reports2026
Validation of photoplethysmography-derived short-term heart rate variability using a wearable device.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects cardiac autonomic function and cardiovascular health. While electrocardiography (ECG) remains the gold standard for HRV assessment, photoplethysmography (PPG)-based wearables offer an alternative for monitoring. This study aimed to validate the wrist-worn PPG device Bora band® for short-term HRV assessment against standard ECG and to characterize domain-specific agreement patterns. In this prospective, single-center observational study, 66 participants in sinus rhythm underwent simultaneous high-resolution 12-lead ECG and wrist-based PPG recording for 5 min and 30 s. PPG-derived interbeat intervals were extracted and compared to ECG-derived R-R intervals. Sixteen HRV metrics from time-, frequency-, and non-linear domains were computed for both modalities. Agreement was assessed using biweight mid-correlation (ρ), Cliff's delta (δ), and equivalence testing (TOST). Strong agreement was observed for mean heart rate (ρ = 1.0, δ = 0.104, TOST p < 0.001), standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (ρ = 0.98, δ = 0.037, TOST p = 0.003), deceleration capacity of heart rate (ρ = 0.95, δ = 0.071, TOST p = 0.014), coefficient of variation of normal-to-normal intervals (ρ = 0.98, δ = 0.035, TOST p = 0.002) and Poincaré Plot standard deviation 2 (ρ = 0.99, δ = 0.074, TOST p < 0.001). Moderate agreement was noted for long-term fractal scaling exponent and very low-, low- and high-frequency power. Weaker agreement appeared for short-term variability and entropy metrics. Bland-Altman analysis indicated minimal bias without systematic error. Under controlled resting conditions, wrist-based PPG provides reliable HRV indices compared with ECG-derived HRV. These findings support the use of selected PPG-derived HRV parameters for short-term assessment in clinical settings. Further validation in real-world settings will be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.