ArticleScientific reports2026
Prediction method of blasting vibration velocity of high slope based on bayes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of blasting vibration velocity and effective control of vibration-induced hazards remain key challenges in blasting engineering. Using monitoring data from a high-slope blasting project in the Pan Nan 2 × 660 MW low-calorific-value coal comprehensive utilization power generation project, this study develops a Bayesian dynamic updating model for peak particle velocity (PPV) prediction based on the classical Sadovsky formula. Unlike conventional static regression approaches with fixed parameters and limited datasets, the proposed method treats the model parameters K and α as random variables and updates their posterior distributions through a Bayesian inference framework as new monitoring data become available. This enables continuous adaptation to complex geological conditions, including joints, faults, weathered zones, and topographic variability, as well as variations in charge configuration and wave propagation characteristics. Results show that as blasting data accumulate, the posterior distributions of the parameters gradually converge, significantly improving model accuracy and robustness. During the updating process, the coefficient of determination (R²) increases from 0.31 to 0.98, while the root mean square error (RMSE) decreases from 3.38 to 1.18. Independent validation using subsequent monitoring data further confirms the model's stability and generalization capability, with an R² of 0.97 and an RMSE of 0.5. In comparison, the traditional Sadovsky regression model shows considerably lower performance, with an R² of - 0.04 and an RMSE of 3.24. The results demonstrate that the proposed Bayesian framework effectively integrates new observations, continuously refines model parameters, and significantly enhances prediction accuracy and reliability. This method provides a robust and adaptive tool for blasting vibration prediction and safety control in complex geological environments, with strong potential for real-time engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.