ArticleScientific reports2026
Temporally rigorous and traceable predictive maintenance via joint labeler-model optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predictive maintenance (PdM) is a critical enabler of intelligent asset management in Industry 4.0, yet many existing frameworks remain difficult to operationalize due to methodological fragmentation. Common limitations include sacrificing temporal realism and class granularity for computational expediency, decoupling labeling strategy design from model hyperparameter optimization, and insufficient support for reproducibility and deployment traceability; particularly in rare-failure regimes. To address these challenges, we propose a unified, end-to-end, and fully traceable PdM framework that jointly optimizes labeling and model parameters while enforcing strict temporal fidelity. The proposed pipeline co-optimizes the failure lookahead window (τ) and LightGBM hyperparameters within a single Bayesian optimization space using Optuna with a Tree-structured Parzen Estimator and MedianPruner, eliminating the suboptimality of fixed or decoupled labeling designs. Temporal leakage is rigorously prevented through forward-chaining cross-validation and a strictly disjoint temporal holdout evaluation. The framework is evaluated on the widely adopted Fidan synthetic dataset (876,100 samples, five classes, [Formula: see text] failure rate), achieving state-of-the-art performance with a macro-F1 score of 0.9875, balanced accuracy of 0.9915, and superior PR-AUC compared to prior benchmarks. Computational analysis and ablation studies confirm both scalability and the non-redundant contribution of key design choices. Crucially, the pipeline exports versioned, reproducible artifacts (models, preprocessors, configurations) designed to support enterprise integration pending site-specific validation. Operational impact projections (e.g., reduced downtime, fewer dispatches) are derived from analogous deployments and require field validation for quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.