Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151342›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Perspectives and lessons from a community-based collaborative eye care model in Singapore.

Wanfen Yip, Adeline Kon, Michelle Jessica Pereira, Joseph Antonio De Castro Molina, Kiok Liang Teow, Vernon Khet Yau Yong, Hon Tym Wong, Tock Han Lim, Vivien Cherng Hui Yip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wanfen YipHealth Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 1 Mandalay Road, National Skin Centre, Singapore, 308205, Singapore. wan.fen.yip@nhghealth.com.sg.
Adeline KonHealth Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 1 Mandalay Road, National Skin Centre, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
Michelle Jessica PereiraHealth Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 1 Mandalay Road, National Skin Centre, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
Joseph Antonio De Castro MolinaHealth Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 1 Mandalay Road, National Skin Centre, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
Kiok Liang TeowHealth Services and Outcomes Research, National Healthcare Group, 1 Mandalay Road, National Skin Centre, Singapore, 308205, Singapore.
Vernon Khet Yau YongNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hon Tym WongNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Tock Han LimNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Vivien Cherng Hui YipNational Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

National Medical Research Council PHRGNIG22July-0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Primary Eye Care (PEC) model aimed to right-site patients with non-complex eye conditions by upskilling optometrists. However, there is a paucity of studies examining healthcare professionals' and patients' perceptions and context that influenced implementation of community-based eye care model. This study aimed to explore contextual factors (e.g., interprofessional relationships, patients' perceptions) that influenced implementation of PEC and potential strategies to the identified barriers. Qualitative research design was adopted to elicit the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals. Eight focus group discussions (FGDs) and four in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with 32 healthcare professionals, and 12 IDIs were conducted with 14 patients/caregivers between June 2023 to March 2024. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically using an inductive approach. Three themes were identified that influenced the implementation of PEC. First, a bidirectional ophthalmologist-optometrists partnership supported implementation and maintenance of high-quality care. PEC's high-quality care experienced by the ophthalmologists influenced their motivation to refer patients to PEC paving the way for responsibility transfer and role expansion. Second, limited interprofessional interactions between primary care physicians and optometrists impacted the awareness of PEC's services and quality of care, dampening referral motivation. Third, patients' awareness of PEC integration with hospital services and optometrists' capability influenced acceptance of PEC referrals. To enhance primary care physicians' awareness and address patients' concern on PEC integration with hospital services, PEC team will need to prioritise active engagement with primary care physicians and dissemination of interactive patient education.

Indexed as

Eye DiseasesAdultCooperative BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptometristsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchSingapore

Identifiers

PMID42151342
PMCPMC13381590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.