Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151333›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Remote monitoring of powder dehumidification by speckle pattern analysis.

Mahsa Asghari, Eric van Bruggen, Kamal Heidary, Ali-Reza Moradi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mahsa Asghari *Department of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), 45137-66731, Zanjan, Iran.
Eric van Bruggen *Department of Food Sciences and Agrotechnology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Kamal HeidaryDepartment of Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biology, University of Kassel, 34321, Kassel, Germany.
Ali-Reza MoradiDepartment of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS), 45137-66731, Zanjan, Iran. moradika@iasbs.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive monitoring of heterogeneous powders is a required task in several food science and industrial applications. We introduce laser speckle analysis (LSA) as a remote, non-contact, non-invasive, cost-effective, and speedy approach for tracking powder dehumidification. LSA is based on the statistical analysis of dynamic speckle patterns that are generated from scattering samples upon laser light illumination. In this work, LSA is applied to monitor dehumidification dynamics in cornstarch powder, chosen as a representative hygroscopic food system. Cornstarch is selected due to its industrial relevance as one of the most widely used hygroscopic food powders, where moisture content strongly governs flowability, caking, and shelf life. In addition, its highly diffusive structure provides a suitable testbed for LSA experiments. As drying progresses, the speckle-derived metrics exhibit specific trends that indicate a gradual reduction of internal dynamics. The optical observations are validated by gravimetric measurements and 3D profilometry. The results present a two-stage drying profile, characterized by an initial phase of rapid mass loss followed by a slower approach toward equilibrium. Collectively, the LSA results, in agreement with the validating experiments, reveal the formation and stabilization of surface micro-fractures over time. The technique effectively captures both dynamic and structural transitions, offering a practical solution for process monitoring and quality control in industrial settings, and has the potential to serve as a bench-top analysis device.

Identifiers

PMID42151333
PMCPMC13338135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.