ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantitative measurement of stag beetle behaviors in low light and complex background conditions using DAMM (detect any mouse model).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aggressive behavior in insects plays a crucial role in various ecological and evolutionary processes, influencing resource acquisition, mate competition, and social organization. Stag beetles (Lucanidae) represent a compelling model system for studying aggression, particularly male-male combat. However, studying their interactions in a contest test with low light-a common condition for nocturnal species-and a complex background to mimic their natural environment remains challenging due to poor visibility and tracking limitations. Here, we adapted Detect Any Mouse Model (DAMM), a machine learning-driven tracking framework, to detect and track the position of each male stag beetle of two species (C. mniszechi and C. speciosus), followed by the calculation of several essential behavior endpoints to quantitatively analyze their behaviors with a conspecific during the test. The calculated object detection metrics indicated that the DAMM performed well in detecting and classifying objects. Meanwhile, based on the behavior endpoints, C. mniszechi displayed more robust behaviors during the test compared to C. speciosus, which was indicated by the tendency of this species to secure the food tube while fighting another contestant to defend their position. In addition, the calculated fighting-related-behavior endpoints also showed consistent results with the manual observation, highlighting the validity of the calculated endpoints. To sum up, the adaptation of DAMM to study insect behavior enables researchers to quantify their behaviors and automation that would undoubtedly lead to unprecedentedly detailed and objective insights into the complex behaviors of insects, especially stag beetles, contributing to a deeper understanding of their ecology, evolution, and the intricate workings of the natural world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.