Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151296›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Resource-efficient federated machine unlearning via evolutionary synaptic pruning for cloud-based distributed learning systems.

Himani Bansal, Bhuvan Unhelkar, Dilip Kumar Jang Bahadur Saini, Bipin Kumar Rai, Pooja Sharma, Gautam Kumar, Prasun Chakrabarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Himani BansalJaypee Institute of Information Technology, Noida, India. singal.himani@gmail.com.
Bhuvan UnhelkarUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Dilip Kumar Jang Bahadur SainiDepartment of CSE (Cybersecurity), , Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, India.
Bipin Kumar RaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Dayananda Sagar University, Bengaluru, India.
Pooja SharmaSRTTC-FOE, Khamshet, Pune, India.
Gautam KumarManipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, India. gautam.kumar@jaipur.manipal.edu.
Prasun ChakrabartiSir Padampat Singhania University, Udaipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an increasing emphasis on user data control and privacy regulations, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a crucial mechanism for managing data in AI systems. MU enables models to remove the influence of specific user data upon request. This problem becomes more complex in collaborative settings such as Federated Learning (FL), where data remains distributed across multiple clients, giving rise to Federated Unlearning (FU). In large-scale deployments, particularly those supported by cloud infrastructure, retraining models to satisfy data deletion requests can be computationally expensive, energy-intensive, and disruptive to ongoing services. This highlights the importance of having effective methods to unlearn outdated practices that can hinder the growth of a system and compromise data privacy awareness. We propose PRUNE-FL (Privacy-preserving Retention-focused Unlearning with Neuro-Evolution in Federated Learning), a framework that uses relevance-guided pruning and evolutionary optimization to delete the influence of the targeted data. PRUNE-FL is different from methods that rely on retraining or coarse parameter updates because it focuses on finding and changing the parameters that are most closely related to the data that needs to be forgotten. The approach is based on a synaptic relevance scoring system to figure out how each model parameter relates to certain client or class-level data. This makes it easier to find parameters that are connected to the target data. Then, the unlearning task is set up as a multi-objective problem to find a balance between the overall performance and the forgetting of unnecessary information. Finally, a genetic algorithm is used to implement an evolutionary pruning strategy. It seeks the optimal pruning settings that operate within the constraints of federated learning. Thus, PRUNE-FL helps in unlearning specific data without having to retrain the whole system. Tests on the CIFAR-10 dataset in both IID (Independent and Identically Distributed) and non-IID settings show that PRUNE-FL has higher accuracy. It also effectively removes the influence of the targeted data. The results also show it to be strong against bad patterns like backdoor triggers. Overall, PRUNE-FL enhances privacy by selectively unlearning the data and using fewer resources in federated environments.

Indexed as

Cloud resource optimizationDifferential privacyDistributed machine learningEdge-cloud systemsFederated unlearningMachine unlearningPrivacy preservationSelective forgettingSynaptic pruning

Identifiers

PMID42151296
PMCPMC13377013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.