Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151282›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Benchmarking short- and long-read sequencing technologies for metagenomic profiling of microbiomes.

Grazia Visci, Elisabetta Notario, Giuseppe Defazio, Mariano Francesco Caratozzolo, Sharon Natasha Cox, Bruno Fosso, Marinella Marzano, Graziano Pesole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Grazia Visci *Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, 70125, Italy.
Elisabetta Notario *Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, 70126, Italy.
Giuseppe Defazio *Department of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, 70125, Italy.
Mariano Francesco CaratozzoloInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, 70126, Italy.
Sharon Natasha CoxDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, 70125, Italy.
Bruno FossoDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, 70125, Italy. bruno.fosso@uniba.it.
Marinella MarzanoInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, 70126, Italy. marinella.marzano@cnr.it.
Graziano PesoleDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, 70125, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PNC0000002 - CUP: B53C22006420001Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PNC-EJ-2022-23683266 PNC-HLS-DARegione Puglia H93C22000560003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two culture-independent methods, amplicon-based sequencing and shotgun metagenomics, have significantly advanced the study of microbial communities. To date, short-read sequencing technologies have enabled high accuracy and deep coverage, while long-read sequencing approaches are increasingly being applied to improve genome assembly, despite challenges related to sequencing errors and nucleic acid input requirements. In this benchmark study, we compared the shotgun metagenomics approach across three sequencing technologies, Illumina (short reads), PacBio and Nanopore (long reads), using a 20-species commercial mock microbial community with even species representation. Specifically, we evaluated the effectiveness of the data generated by each platform in reconstructing genomes and identifying specific known taxa, as well as in understanding their functional potential, considering annotated genes, the length of predicted proteins and the number and types of inferred functions. Illumina sequencing provided high-throughput and high-quality data, but its limited read length precluded complete genome assembly. This affected the functional analysis, leading to an underestimation of coding and non-coding genes. Nanopore sequencing yielded the longest reads, resulting in more contiguous assemblies, although it was affected by higher error rates and the choice of assembly method. PacBio offered the best balance between read length and base accuracy, but with a lower number of reads. This affected genome coverage for certain taxa, influencing the quality of their assemblies, the completeness of MAGs (Metagenome Assembled Genomes), and the accuracy of functional annotation. Nevertheless, PacBio successfully retrieved MAGs for all mock community species, and the genome annotation was consistent with the reference. Evaluating the strengths and limitations of different NGS technologies and assembly strategies, this benchmark provides a practical framework for selecting the most suitable approach for optimizing data quality in microbiome genome characterization, according to study-specific goals.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMetagenomicsMicrobiotaBacteriaBenchmarkingNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAShotgun SequencingFunctional analysisMAGsMicrobiomeMock community analysisNext-generation sequencingShotgun metagenomicsThird-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID42151282
PMCPMC13381936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.