ArticleScientific reports2026
Benchmarking short- and long-read sequencing technologies for metagenomic profiling of microbiomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The lung microbiome in childhood-onset severe neuromuscular disease with respiratory insufficiency: rationale, current evidence, and opportunities for oxford nanopore long-read sequencing.Molecular and cellular pediatrics · 2026Review
- A data-driven universal gut microbiome health assessment: a machine learning framework trained on large metagenomic data.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two culture-independent methods, amplicon-based sequencing and shotgun metagenomics, have significantly advanced the study of microbial communities. To date, short-read sequencing technologies have enabled high accuracy and deep coverage, while long-read sequencing approaches are increasingly being applied to improve genome assembly, despite challenges related to sequencing errors and nucleic acid input requirements. In this benchmark study, we compared the shotgun metagenomics approach across three sequencing technologies, Illumina (short reads), PacBio and Nanopore (long reads), using a 20-species commercial mock microbial community with even species representation. Specifically, we evaluated the effectiveness of the data generated by each platform in reconstructing genomes and identifying specific known taxa, as well as in understanding their functional potential, considering annotated genes, the length of predicted proteins and the number and types of inferred functions. Illumina sequencing provided high-throughput and high-quality data, but its limited read length precluded complete genome assembly. This affected the functional analysis, leading to an underestimation of coding and non-coding genes. Nanopore sequencing yielded the longest reads, resulting in more contiguous assemblies, although it was affected by higher error rates and the choice of assembly method. PacBio offered the best balance between read length and base accuracy, but with a lower number of reads. This affected genome coverage for certain taxa, influencing the quality of their assemblies, the completeness of MAGs (Metagenome Assembled Genomes), and the accuracy of functional annotation. Nevertheless, PacBio successfully retrieved MAGs for all mock community species, and the genome annotation was consistent with the reference. Evaluating the strengths and limitations of different NGS technologies and assembly strategies, this benchmark provides a practical framework for selecting the most suitable approach for optimizing data quality in microbiome genome characterization, according to study-specific goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.