ArticleScientific reports2026
A soft computing TOPSIS framework with fractional orthopair fuzzy sine aggregation for robust model evaluation in data science.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Model selection in data science involves evaluating multiple alternatives across conflicting criteria under uncertainty, where existing fuzzy multi criteria group decision making (MCGDM) approaches often fail to capture asymmetric uncertainty and nonlinear interactions in expert judgments. To address this limitation, this study proposes a novel MCGDM framework based on fractional orthopair fuzzy sets (FOFS). The FOFS structure enables flexible and precise modeling of uncertainty by allowing independent fractional control of membership degree (MD) and non-membership degree (NMD). Furthermore, sine trigonometric aggregation operators are introduced to capture nonlinear relationships and fluctuations in expert evaluations. An integrated FOFS-TOPSIS method is then developed to rank candidate models based on their distances from positive ideal solution (PIS) and negative ideal solution (NIS). The applicability of the framework is demonstrated through a numerical study involving fifteen predictive models, fifteen evaluation criteria, and three experts. The results indicate that Alternative [Formula: see text] achieved the highest overall ranking, followed by [Formula: see text], while mid and lower ranked models revealed trade-offs in accuracy, computational efficiency, and robustness. Comparative and sensitivity analyses confirm the framework's robustness, stability, and superior ranking performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.