ArticleScientific reports2026
Nanoplastics impair antitumor NK and CD8⁺ T cell cytotoxicity and antiviral B cell antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoplastics are pervasive environmental contaminants that continuously expose humans and accumulate in multiple organs. Increasing evidence associates NPs with adverse health effects, including inflammation and carcinogenesis, yet their impact on human innate and adaptive immunity remains poorly understood. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant for diseases treated with therapies that modulate immune responses. Here, we investigated the effects of NP exposure on major subsets of human peripheral lymphocytes, essential for antitumor and antiviral defense while preserving immune tolerance. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors were exposed to oxidized and plasma-exposed NPs, which acquired a stable protein corona. NP exposure induced a time-dependent increase in immune cell interactions and resulted in reduced activation and functionality of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells. T lymphocytes displayed impaired tumor antigen-specific responses, while natural killer cells showed decreased tumor cell-killing capacity. Notably, B cells internalized NPs, leading to reduced ability to generate antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Overall, these findings demonstrate that NPs compromise both innate and adaptive immune functions, weakening antiviral and antitumor responses. Our results highlight potential risks associated with NP exposure for susceptibility to infections and cancer as well as immune-based therapy efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.