Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrated experimental design and machine learning framework for predicting UV influenced mechanical properties in polyurethane nanodiamond nanocomposites.

Markapudi Bhanu Prasad, Abdullah A Elfar, P S Rama Sreekanth, Santosh Kumar Sahu, Borhen Louhichi, It Ee Lee, Qamar Wali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Markapudi Bhanu PrasadSchool of Mechanical Engineering, VIT-AP University, Besides A.P. Secretariat, Amaravati, 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Abdullah A ElfarDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11432, Saudi Arabia.
P S Rama SreekanthSchool of Mechanical Engineering, VIT-AP University, Besides A.P. Secretariat, Amaravati, 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Santosh Kumar SahuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, VIT-AP University, Besides A.P. Secretariat, Amaravati, 522237, Andhra Pradesh, India. sksahumech@gmail.com.
Borhen LouhichiEngineering Sciences Research Center (ESRC), Deanship of Scientific Research, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11432, Saudi Arabia.
It Ee LeeFaculty of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, 63100, Malaysia. ielee@mmu.edu.my.
Qamar WaliCentre for Smart Systems and Automation, COE for Robotics and Sensing Technologies, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, 63100, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation on the mechanical performance of nanodiamond (ND) reinforced polyurethane (PU) nanocomposites. The Taguchi method was employed to systematically design the experiments, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the statistical significance and percentage contribution of each factor. An L27 orthogonal array was adopted to examine the effects of composition (pure PU, 0.2 wt% PU/ND, and 0.5 wt% PU/ND), UV exposure duration (0, 200, and 400 h), UV irradiation intensity (1.0, 1.20, and 1.40 W/m²), and UV temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C) on tensile strength, Young's modulus, and hardness. The results indicate that 200 h of UV exposure enhances tensile strength and Young's modulus for all samples, with the most pronounced improvement observed in the 0.5 wt% PU/ND nanocomposite, whereas hardness decreases with increasing exposure due to UV-induced surface degradation. ANOVA results indicate that composition and UV exposure duration are the most influential parameters, contributing 48.76% and 17.58% to tensile strength and 40.21% and 19.13% to Young's modulus, respectively. For hardness, UV exposure duration is the dominant factor, contributing 49.6%. Machine learning models, including linear regression, artificial neural networks, and Gaussian process regression, were developed for prediction. Among them, the Gaussian process model showed the highest accuracy with R² values of 0.99, 0.95, and 0.98 for tensile strength, Young's modulus, and hardness, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of PU/ND nanocomposites for applications in automotive components, robotic parts, and aerospace structures.

Indexed as

ANOVAMachine learningNDPUTaguchiUV

Identifiers

PMID42151230
PMCPMC13376870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.