ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrated experimental design and machine learning framework for predicting UV influenced mechanical properties in polyurethane nanodiamond nanocomposites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of ultraviolet (UV) irradiation on the mechanical performance of nanodiamond (ND) reinforced polyurethane (PU) nanocomposites. The Taguchi method was employed to systematically design the experiments, while analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the statistical significance and percentage contribution of each factor. An L27 orthogonal array was adopted to examine the effects of composition (pure PU, 0.2 wt% PU/ND, and 0.5 wt% PU/ND), UV exposure duration (0, 200, and 400 h), UV irradiation intensity (1.0, 1.20, and 1.40 W/m²), and UV temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C) on tensile strength, Young's modulus, and hardness. The results indicate that 200 h of UV exposure enhances tensile strength and Young's modulus for all samples, with the most pronounced improvement observed in the 0.5 wt% PU/ND nanocomposite, whereas hardness decreases with increasing exposure due to UV-induced surface degradation. ANOVA results indicate that composition and UV exposure duration are the most influential parameters, contributing 48.76% and 17.58% to tensile strength and 40.21% and 19.13% to Young's modulus, respectively. For hardness, UV exposure duration is the dominant factor, contributing 49.6%. Machine learning models, including linear regression, artificial neural networks, and Gaussian process regression, were developed for prediction. Among them, the Gaussian process model showed the highest accuracy with R² values of 0.99, 0.95, and 0.98 for tensile strength, Young's modulus, and hardness, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of PU/ND nanocomposites for applications in automotive components, robotic parts, and aerospace structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.