ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact frequency and interval modulate brain network outcomes in a rat model of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is an increasing public health concern, however, how impact frequency and inter-injury interval shape long-term brain network function remains unclear. This study investigated the effects of varying impact number and interval duration on functional connectivity and neurological outcomes in a rat model of repetitive mTBI. Fifty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to five groups: sham, single impact, two impacts (1-hour interval), three impacts (1-hour interval), and three impacts (6-hour interval) of closed-head injury. At 50 days post-injury, resting-state functional MRI and behavioral assessments were performed. Rats exposed to repetitive impacts at 1-hour intervals showed widespread disruptions in functional connectivity across default mode, sensory, and motor networks, with alterations increasing according to impact number. These network changes were attenuated in rats receiving impacts spaced 6 h apart, which exhibited connectivity patterns closer to sham controls. Behavioral testing revealed significant motor impairments in the 1-hour interval group, whereas motor performance was preserved in the 6-hour interval group. Connectivity within sensory and motor networks correlated with motor outcomes. These findings demonstrate that injury frequency and timing influence brain network integrity and suggest that extending inter-injury intervals may mitigate cumulative neural dysfunction following repetitive mTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.