ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of intrapartum epidural analgesia and oxytocin exposure with offspring autism and neurodevelopment from the Japan Environment and Children's Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the increasing prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders, this study examined the association between autism and neurodevelopmental delays and exposure to intrapartum labor epidural analgesia (LEA) and synthetic oxytocin (OT) in offspring. The data were obtained from various questionnaires, including the Japanese Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition. Using data from a large-scale longitudinal birth cohort study in Japan, 72,801 participants were enrolled and follow-up to age 4 years. Exposure during labor was categorized into four groups: no-exposure, OT, LEA, and LEA-OT. Adjusted odds ratios for autism were 2.35 (95% CI 1.44-3.83) in the LEA-OT group and 2.41 (95% CI 1.31-4.45) in the LEA group. The E-values for the point estimates were 4.16 in the LEA-OT group and 4.29 in the LEA group, and those for the lower limits of the 95% confidence intervals were 2.39 and 2.05, respectively, indicating only moderate robustness to unmeasured confounding. Associations with autism were consistent across analyses in the LEA-OT group, but in sex-stratified analyses, only males showed an association. No consistent associations with neurodevelopmental delays were observed in any exposure groups. Since residual confounding cannot be excluded, with limited external validity, these findings warrant replication in independent cohorts to clarify causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.