ArticleScientific reports2026
Mavodelpar in patients with primary mitochondrial myopathy: a phase 1 trial.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary mitochondrial myopathies (PMM) are rare, genetically-defined disorders characterised by defects of oxidative phosphorylation, predominantly affecting skeletal muscle. This Phase 1b open-label trial evaluated mavodelpar, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARδ) agonist, over 12 weeks (Part A), with an optional 36 week extension (Part B) in adults with PMM. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability, with secondary assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and exploratory performance, patient-reported, and muscle biopsy outcomes. Of the 23 participants who received mavodelpar, 17 completed Part A; none completed Part B due to premature study termination during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adverse events were mild-moderate severity, with headache and constipation most common (4/23 participants; 17.4% each). Exploratory measures showed a mean increase of 104 m in the twelve minute walk test (95% CI: 53 to 156) and a mean reduction of -10.5 points in patient-reported fatigue (95% CI: -16.3 to -4.6). No consistent changes in mitochondrial function were detected in muscle biopsies (n = 10), while transcriptomic profiling (n = 6) revealed modest upregulation of fatty acid-metabolism pathways. Although findings from this Phase 1b trial supported progression to later-phase evaluation, the subsequent Phase 2b trial did not demonstrate clinical efficacy for mavodelpar. The results reported here should be interpreted as exploratory and not indicative of therapeutic benefit. Nevertheless, this Phase 1b trial provides important methodological insights to inform future PMM clinical trial design and outcome measure development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.