ArticleScientific data2026
Proteome of Bronchial Alveolar Lavage fluid and Serum from Tuberculosis patients during drug treatment.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with tuberculosis (TB) undergo months of drug treatment before cure. Recent studies suggest that, even after successful treatment, TB patients may not fully clear the bacterium and be at risk for disease recurrence due to reactivation of resident bacilli. In this study, we conducted an analysis of the proteome of ten TB patients at week 1 after initiation of therapy and after twenty-five weeks of therapy, and also in 10 healthy community controls to identify dynamic and stable protein patterns in the lung and blood. We used bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALf) and serum from each TB patient at both time points for our analyses and identified 2,060 and 416 proteins in the BALf and serum samples, respectively, from at least 60% of the samples from each group. Six proteins shared significant trends between the two sample types. Data are available via ProteomeXchange PXD073337 for comparative studies and include a unique, paired BALf proteome data set in addition to a paired serum sample set from the same study subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.