ArticleScientific reports2026
Tensor language model enables generative scheduling for efficient tensor compilation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high rate of increase in the deep learning tasks as well as heterogeneous computing systems necessitates compilers that achieve low compile time and high performance. The current state of the art in the use of tensor compilers is based on exhaustive search, a slow and prohibitive process, or heuristics at the expense of generality and quality of optimisation. The paper presents the Tensor Language Model (TLM), a generative framework of a compiler that redefines the optimisation of tensor programmes as a language modelling problem. TLM is also based on a GPT-2 architecture that is pre-trained on millions of tensor programs coded as compact tensor code capturing operator graphs, hardware metadata, and reconfiguration choices as a sequence of tokens. The model creates optimised schedules of tensors, thus avoiding any search or reinforcement learning at run time. Experimental results using ResNet-50, BERT, GPT-2 and LLAMA-7B indicate that TLM compiles up to 61 times faster than search-based compilers (e.g., Ansor, MetaSchedule) and is up to 2.25 times faster than heuristic models (e.g. Roller), and has similar runtime efficiency. TLM then selects a trade-off seemingly traditional between compilation time and execution performance, a scalable, hardware-agnostic and reproducible generative paradigm of next-generation deep learning compilers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.