ArticleNature communications2026
Joint clinical and molecular subtyping of COPD with variational autoencoders.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Joint clinical and molecular subtyping of COPD with variational autoencoders.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Temporal Exploration of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes: Insights from the COPDGene and SPIROMICS Cohorts.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a complex, heterogeneous disease. Traditional subtyping methods generally focus on either the clinical manifestations or the molecular endotypes of the disease, leading to classifications that only partially reflect disease heterogeneity. Here, we introduce a variational autoencoder-based subtyping pipeline that jointly embeds clinical and gene expression data into a single subject-level representation. We evaluate the framework in the COPDGene study, a large study of current and former smoking individuals with and without COPD. Prediction experiments show that the embeddings have predictive accuracy comparable to or better than other unsupervised embedding approaches. Using trajectory learning approaches, we identify five well-separated subtypes with distinct clinical phenotypes, expression signatures, and longitudinal outcomes. Finally, we show that our findings generalize to an external validation cohort. Overall, our approach enables a transition from isolated phenotypic or molecular subtyping toward an integrated and clinically meaningful understanding of COPD heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.