ReviewBone research2026
From complexity to clarity: aging bone marrow niche in bone and blood regeneration and malignancy.
Review in Bone research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Rejuvenation Strategies Targeting Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Their Impact on Bone Health and Regeneration.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Bone Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Form a Distinct Skeletal Population and Drive Skeletal Repair.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Osteocyte-vascular Interactions in Bone Physiology and Pathology.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Editorial: Molecular and cellular mechanisms of bone remodeling.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- RANKL-convergent osteoimmune network framework in osteoporosis: integrating macrophage activation, T-cell imbalance, and cytokine crosstalk.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- RANKL-convergent osteoimmune network framework in osteoporosis: integrating macrophage activation, T-cell imbalance, and cytokine crosstalk.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The bone marrow niche (BMN) plays a central role in regulating hematopoietic stem-cell (HSC) maintenance, lineage commitment, and immune homeostasis, while also supporting osteogenesis and maintaining skeletal integrity. Once considered static, the BMN is now recognized as a dynamic and responsive microenvironment that integrates local signals and systemic cues to meet physiological demands and respond to stress. Aging causes profound and progressive changes to this niche, leading to functional decline across both hematopoietic and stromal compartments. Recent advances in high-resolution imaging, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and in vivo lineage tracing have revealed remarkable heterogeneity and plasticity within the vascular and mesenchymal elements of this niche. Yet, key questions remain unresolved, including the identity and hierarchy of mesenchymal and osteolineage cells, the specialization of subsets of endothelial cells, the integration of systemic regulation, and whether the aging bone marrow acts as a driver or a passenger in malignancy and chronic inflammation. This review revisits current models of the BMN, with a focus on the reciprocal interactions between osteogenic cells and specialized vasculature, and how their disruption during aging impairs hematopoietic output and skeletal remodeling. We also examine how systemic factors such as neural input, metabolic status, and inflammatory signaling influence the aging of the BMN. Finally, we highlight emerging translational platforms, including iPSC-derived bone marrow organoids, engineered niches/hydrogels, and vascularized organ-on-chip systems, that enable mechanistic testing of rejuvenation strategies. Together, these insights have the potential to pave the way toward targeted interventions that restore the function of the BMN and promote healthy aging of the bone and blood systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.