Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151037›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2026

The Role of Ear Canal Sound Pressure in Bone Conduction Across Different Bone Conduction Devices.

Tobias Mair, Ivo Dobrev, Christof Röösli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias MairDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-6192-8083
Ivo Dobrev
Christof Röösli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesConflicting findings exist regarding the contribution of the outer ear canal pathway to bone conduction (BC) hearing perception. This pathway, represented by the ear canal sound pressure (EC SP ) generated under BC stimulation, may vary in significance depending on the type and position of bone conduction devices (BCDs). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between EC SP , cochlear promontory motion (V PROM ), and intracochlear pressure in the scala vestibuli (P SV ) across different BCD coupling types to evaluate the ear canal's contribution to BC hearing.

designMeasurements were conducted on 5 human cadaver heads using 4 types of BCD coupling conditions: an adhesive BCD, an active transcutaneous BCD at 2 positions, and a percutaneous BCD. ECSP was recorded in an open ear canal during BC stimulation, while 3-dimensional cochlear promontory motion was captured through laser Doppler vibrometry, and intracochlear pressure was measured using a custom pressure sensor. Frequency-dependent relationships among EC SP , V PROM , and P SV were analyzed and compared across coupling types.

resultsFrequency-dependent differences were observed in the relationships between EC SP , V PROM , and P SV . Below 2 kHz, all devices exhibited a relatively flat relationship, with the adhesive BCD producing 10 to 15 dB higher EC SP relative to promontory motion compared with both the active transcutaneous and percutaneous BCDs. Around the ear canal resonance between 2 kHz and 3 kHz, EC SP increased by 10 to 20 dB relative to both V PROM and P SV . For the adhesive BCD, the resulting P SV -to-EC SP relationship was comparable to that observed under air conduction stimulation. Above the bony ear canal resonance, the relative contribution of EC SP declined.

conclusionThis study demonstrates frequency-dependent and coupling-dependent relationships among EC SP , V PROM , and P SV , highlighting the contribution of the outer ear canal to bone conduction hearing. While this pathway is unlikely to substantially influence perception in conductive hearing loss, it may affect bone conduction hearing assessments in normal-hearing subjects.

Indexed as

Bone ConductionEar CanalHearing AidsAcoustic StimulationCadaverFemaleHumansPressureSoundBone conductionEar canal sound pressureIntracochlear pressurePromontory motion

Identifiers

PMID42151037
PMCPMC13348832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.