Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42150913›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026

[Preparation and

Cheng Zeng, Jin Tang, Tao Li, Wenshan Gao

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng ZengDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Wuhan Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western (The Affiliated Hospital of Wuhan Sports University), Wuhan Hubei, 430000, P. R. China.
Jin TangDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Wuhan Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western (The Affiliated Hospital of Wuhan Sports University), Wuhan Hubei, 430000, P. R. China.
Tao LiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Wuhan Orthopaedics Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western (The Affiliated Hospital of Wuhan Sports University), Wuhan Hubei, 430000, P. R. China.
Wenshan GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Hebei University Affiliated Hospital, Baoding Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects of tannic acid (TA) doping on the physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, Methods: TA was incorporated into Brushite bone cement at concentrations of 0, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/g of solid powder, designated as Brushite, Brushite/TA-1, Brushite/TA-2, Brushite/TA-3, and Brushite/TA-4, respectively. The compressive strength and microstructure of each group were evaluated. The extracts of the bone cements were prepared and co-cultured with MC3T3-E1 cells. Cell proliferation was assessed using the cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) assay. The cytotoxicity was observed by Calcein/propidium iodide live/dead cell staining. Cell adhesion was observed via scanning electron microscopy. After osteogenic induction, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured and ALP staining was performed. The expression levels of osteogenic-related genes, including runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN), collagen type Ⅰ (Col-Ⅰ), and integrin-binding sialoprotein (IBSP), were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). The antibacterial activity of the bone cement against Results: Compared with the Brushite group, the Brushite/TA-3 and Brushite/TA-4 groups exhibited significantly increased compressive strength ( Conclusion: Doping with an appropriate concentration of TA (3.0-5.0 mg/g) improves the mechanical properties, cytocompatibility, and osteogenic activity of Brushite bone cement. A higher concentration (10.0 mg/g) confers antibacterial properties but may partially inhibit cell proliferation. TA-doped Brushite bone cement demonstrates good application potential in the field of bone defect repair.

Indexed as

Bone CementsCalcium PhosphatesTannins3T3 CellsAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitMaterials TestingMiceOsteoblastsOsteocalcinAlkaline PhosphataseAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsBone Cementscalcium phosphate, dibasic, dihydrateCalcium PhosphatesCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitOsteocalcinOsteopontinPolyphenolsRunx2 protein, mousetannic acidTanninsantibacterial activitybone cementBrushitecell proliferationosteogenic differentiationosteogenic mineralizationTannic acid

Identifiers

PMID42150913
PMCPMC13184705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.