ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Modified anterior subcutaneous internal fixation versus open reduction and plate fixation in treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate effectiveness of the modified anterior subcutaneous internal fixation (M-INFIX) in treating pubic symphysis diastasis by comparing with open reduction and plate fixation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 33 patients with AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type C1 pelvic fractures, who were admitted between January 2020 and January 2025 and met the selection criteria. Among them, 17 patients underwent open reduction and plate fixation of the pubic symphysis (control group), and 16 patients underwent M-INFIX (modified group). There was no significant difference in baseline data, such as age, gender, and time from injury to operation, between the two groups ( Results: Compared with the control group, the modified group showed shorter operation time and incision, and less intraoperative bleeding, with all differences being significant ( Conclusion: Compared with open reduction and plate fixation, the M-INFIX for treatment of pubic symphysis diastasis offers the advantages of fewer complications, a smaller incision, less bleeding, and shorter operation time, making it a safe and effective surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.