ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Comparative study on effectiveness between laminoplasty with unilateral spinous process-ligament complex preservation and traditional laminoplasty for thoracolumbar intraspinal tumors].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness between laminoplasty with preservation of the unilateral spinous process-ligament complex and traditional laminoplasty for thoracolumbar intraspinal tumors. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 patients with thoracolumbar intraspinal tumors, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between November 2019 and November 2024. Among them, 52 patients underwent traditional laminoplasty (control group), and 39 underwent laminoplasty with preservation of the unilateral spinous process-ligament complex (treatment group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between groups ( Results: There was no significant difference between groups ( Conclusion: Compared to traditional laminoplasty, laminoplasty with preservation of the unilateral spinous process-ligament complex demonstrates comparable results in terms of surgical safety, short-term neurological recovery, and complication control. However, its advantage lies in better maintaining dynamic spinal stability and significantly alleviating pain at the surgical site during spinal hyperflexion and hyperextension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.