ArticleBMJ open2026
Implementation of a clinical decision support tool for postpartum depression: protocol for a prospective randomised clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06818734 (Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Postpartum Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Postpartum Depression
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerinatal mood and anxiety disorders affect more than one in five pregnant individuals. Despite the large percentage of individuals impacted by mood disorders, they continue to remain underdiagnosed and undertreated. Recent interventions such as risk prediction modelling offer opportunities to predict patients at risk prior to symptom onset. Leveraging technology platforms such as electronic health records allow for timely diagnosis and intervention. To date, there are no established clinical decision support (CDS) tools. We hypothesise that subjects who use a CDS aid will find them acceptable, appropriate and feasible. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a pilot randomised clinical trial at three Weill Cornell Medicine clinics with randomisation at the clinician level. Patients in the control arm will receive usual care, while those in the intervention arm will receive CDS. The primary implementation outcomes are the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. The effectiveness outcomes are mental health service utilisation, EuroQol 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and social support measured by the perceived support scale. We hypothesise that stakeholders will find the CDS acceptable, and the intervention arm will have lower mental health service needs compared with control. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Weill Cornell Medicine Internal Review Board. IRB Protocol# 23-07026254. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06818734.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.