ArticleBMJ open2026
What are the views of cancer care administrators and clinicians in England on the use of a machine learning clinical decision support system (ML-CDSS) to predict patients' risk of hepatic and renal deterioration during chemotherapy? A qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore administrators' and clinicians' views on the factors that influence their use and adoption of a machine learning clinical decision support system (ML-CDSS) to predict patients' risk of hepatic and renal deterioration during chemotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This was a qualitative study that used purposive sampling. 18 participants with administration and clinical backgrounds working in cancer care in England were recruited. Qualitative data were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews and a focus group. Data were analysed thematically using the framework method to identify key themes.
resultsParticipants acknowledged that monitoring blood chemistry is a core component of chemotherapy as it helps clinicians assess patient fitness and treatment response. The ML-CDSS was perceived as a potentially valuable tool for identifying patients at increased risk of hepatic and renal deterioration, supporting clinical decision-making and enhancing care efficiency. However, several concerns were raised regarding its potential implementation in practice. Participants questioned clinicians' willingness and capacity to integrate the tool into their existing workflows. Participants also believed it was important to demonstrate the ML-CDSS's sensitivity, specificity and validity in accurately predicting patients' risk to build clinicians' trust in the tool, demonstrating evidence of its efficacy and effectiveness in practice.
conclusionAdministrators and clinicians recognised the potential benefits of the ML-CDSS to enhance the delivery of chemotherapy by identifying patients at risk for hepatic and renal deterioration. Successful adoption in practice depends on building trust with the tool by being transparent in its development, its effectiveness and impact. Future work should demonstrate the ML-CDSS being used in practice to generate real-world evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.