ArticleBMJ global health2026
Ensuring an enabling environment for abortion self-care: individuals' experiences with self-managed abortion in India.
Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndia was one of the first countries to codify the right to abortion care under specific conditions. Yet an estimated three-quarters of all abortions in India are self-managed medication abortion (SMA). We analysed individual experiences with SMA to inform programmes and policy in India.
methodsFrom January to August 2022, we conducted in-depth interviews with people who had SMAs (N=43) between 2016 and 2021 and with individuals who supported someone in their family with SMA (N=11). We used community-based, facility-based and online recruitment to identify potential participants across six states in India. Interviews were conducted in English, Hindi or Tamil. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. To facilitate usefulness for programme and policy-making, we mapped findings to four domains of the WHO's Enabling Environment framework for self-care: information; psychosocial support; health workforce and freedom from violence, stigma, coercion and discrimination.
resultsParticipants described information gaps on recommended medication regimens, expectations of physical symptoms and identification of abortion completion or warning signs. Misinformation about physical symptoms or the safety of abortion medication was widespread. These issues caused emotional distress and uncertainty about care-seeking. Many SMA users received highly valued psychosocial support from friends or family. Participants had positive interactions with unlicensed local providers (LPs) or accredited social health activists along their entire abortion trajectory, while experiences with pharmacists or facility-based health workers, particularly at public facilities, were described negatively. Fear of being judged by their community left many feeling isolated and inhibited in care-seeking. Stigma towards unmarried women posed barriers to receiving medication. Some participants reported reproductive coercion.
conclusionsAbortion stigma in the health system, particularly within public facilities, must be addressed to create a more enabling self-care environment. Training community health workers to provide community-level comprehensive and accurate information about medication regimens, experiences and warning signs could improve abortion experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.