ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2026
Condensed vs. Standard Step-Up Dosing Schedule of Talquetamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) between two different step-up dosing (SUD) schedules with talquetamab, the standard SUD schedule of Days 1, 4, 7, and 10 and a condensed SUD schedule of Days 1, 3, 5, and 7.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective study across seven academic medical centers in the United States and included patients who received talquetamab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The incidence and grade of severity of CRS and ICANS were compared between patients receiving the standard SUD schedule and the condensed SUD schedule.
resultsA total of 144 patients were included in our analysis; 33 received the standard SUD schedule and 111 received the condensed SUD schedule. The incidence of CRS (76% vs. 56%; p = 0.101) and ICANS (9% vs. 16%; p = 0.41) was similar between the standard and condensed SUD cohorts. There was no significant difference in the severity of CRS and ICANS between both cohorts.
conclusionShortening the interval between talquetamab SUDs appears feasible and well-tolerated in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.