ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2026
Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir HIV PrEP Uptake, Adherence, and Persistence in Two Large US Integrated Healthcare Systems.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence and discontinuation: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLong-acting cabotegravir (CAB-LA) was approved as HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the United States in December 2021, but data are limited on uptake, adherence, and persistence in clinical practice.
methodsWe extracted electronic health records of adults receiving oral or injectable PrEP during December 2021 to June 2024 at Kaiser Permanente (KP) Northern California and Mid-Atlantic States, 2 large integrated healthcare systems. We used χ 2 tests to compare characteristics of CAB-LA users and oral-PrEP-only users. Among CAB-LA users, we assessed adherence to bimonthly injections after lead-in doses (weeks 0 and 4) and used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate persistence.
resultsAmong 23,311 individuals accessing oral or injectable PrEP, 180 (0.8%) received CAB-LA, with 23.9% having no documentation of previous PrEP use at KP. Compared with oral-PrEP-only users, a lower proportion of CAB-LA users were commercially insured (82.2% vs 89.2%; P = 0.014) and a higher proportion were Black (18.9% vs 10.2%) or Hispanic (34.4% vs 23.6%; P < 0.001 across race/ethnicity categories). Of 688 non-lead-in CAB-LA injections, 90.4% were administered within 8 weeks +7 days after the previous injection. Persistence on CAB-LA was 87.9% and 74.9% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There were no incident HIV infections during CAB-LA use.
conclusionsCAB-LA is engaging new users, including populations traditionally underrepresented in PrEP uptake, and adherence and persistence are high in clinical practice. However, uptake of CAB-LA is extremely low, suggesting population affect will be limited without efforts to expand implementation and use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.