ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2026
Combined Early Steroid Response and MRD Improve Risk Stratification in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: The CCCG-ALL-2015 Study.
Article in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether early dexamethasone response provides complementary prognostic information to minimal residual disease (MRD) and whether integrating both markers refines risk stratification in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed pediatric ALL patients treated at a single center according to the CCCG-ALL-2015 protocol. Day 5 steroid response was classified as dexamethasone good response (DGR) or dexamethasone poor response (DPR). Bone marrow MRD was measured on Days 19 and 46 of induction. A four-quadrant classification was constructed by combining Day 5 steroid response with Day 46 MRD status (DGR/MRD-, DGR/MRD+, DPR/MRD-, DPR/MRD+) to evaluate event-free survival (EFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR).
resultsAmong 312 patients, 220 were DGR and 92 were DPR. MRD negativity rates on Days 19 and 46 were significantly lower in DPR. Among 304 patients with paired MRD measurements, 181, 102, 18, and 3 patients were classified as D19-/D46-, D19+/D46-, D19+/D46+, and D19-/D46+, respectively, with progressively worse 5-year EFS and increasing 5-year CIR. In the four-quadrant analysis, EFS differed significantly across groups, and compared with DGR/MRD-, the other quadrants exhibited higher event risk. In multivariable Cox models, Day 46 MRD remained independently associated with inferior EFS (HR = 2.429, 95% CI: 1.286-4.590; p = 0.006). When the four-quadrant classification was entered into the multivariable model (reference: DGR/MRD-), DGR/MRD+ (HR = 4.319, 95% CI 1.792-10.414; p = 0.001), DPR/MRD- (HR = 2.207, 95% CI: 1.253-3.888; p = 0.006), and DPR/MRD+ (HR = 3.718, 95% CI: 1.608-8.598; p = 0.002) were each associated with increased event risk.
conclusionsMRD kinetics identify patients with delayed clearance or persistent positivity at higher relapse risk. Integrating early steroid response with MRD using a four-quadrant framework may complement MRD-based assessment and further refine risk stratification by highlighting clinically meaningful discordant subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.