Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42150160›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Supervised and Self-Directed Technology-Based Dual-Task Exercise Training Program for Older Adults With a History of Falls: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Prerna Mathur, Afroditi Stathi, Victoria A Goodyear, Taylor Krauss, Helen Thomas, Angela Cooper, Philip Kinghorn, Caroline Miller, Natalie Ives, Magdalena Chechlacz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Prerna MathurSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom, 44 01214142555.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8764-6256
Afroditi StathiSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom, 44 01214142555.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2162-777X
Victoria A GoodyearSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom, 44 01214142555.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5045-8157
Taylor KraussSolihull Community Specialist Falls Service, Solihull Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Solihull, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-1129
Helen ThomasSolihull Community Specialist Falls Service, Solihull Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Solihull, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9213-2281
Angela CooperSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom, 44 01214142555.
Philip KinghornHealth Economics Unit, Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-1962
Caroline MillerPhysiotherapy Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-0847
Natalie IvesBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-7541
Magdalena ChechlaczSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1811-3946
Daisy WilsonDepartment of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-9487
Laura MagillBirmingham Centre for Observational and Prospective Studies (BiCOPS), School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-8407
Shin-Yi ChiouSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom, 44 01214142555.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-5243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults who have fallen are at an increased risk of future falls. Training cognitive and physical functions simultaneously, known as dual-task (DT) training, has been shown to improve mobility and reduce fall risks. With appropriate digital tools, such as smartphones and mobile apps, it is possible to deliver DT training in unsupervised, home-based settings, thereby increasing accessibility beyond the clinical environment. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a technology-based DT training program delivered through a blended model of supervised and self-directed sessions for older adults with a history of falls. Perspectives of health care professionals working in fall-prevention services were also explored. Methods: A single-arm, nonrandomized feasibility study was conducted with 45 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older with a history of falls. Participants were recruited through primary care practices, secondary care fall-prevention services, and community outreach. The 24-week DT program, which integrated balance and strength exercises with cognitive training using a mobile app, was delivered in two phases: (1) for12 weeks, weekly 50-minute physiotherapist-led group classes in the community, and 2 additional 50-minute self-directed sessions at home, and (2) for 12 weeks, 3 weekly 50-minute self-directed sessions at home. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed through recruitment and retention rates, adherence, app usage, and self-reported satisfaction. Qualitative data were obtained from focus groups with 28 participants who completed the program and 16 health care professionals. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: We recruited 45 of the target 50 participants, with most participants (n=41) recruited through community pathways; 4 were recruited via National Health Service (NHS) pathways. Adherence was 64%, with higher adherence during phase 1 (81%) than phase 2 (50%). App usage was high (95%), and self-reported program satisfaction was moderate to high. Retention at 24 weeks was 76%, and no adverse events occurred. The qualitative findings supported the program's feasibility and acceptability, emphasizing social connection and tailored exercises as key to adherence-especially in home-based sessions. Health care professionals identified community organizations and referral pathways as the most practical routes for implementation. Conclusions: A blended, technology-based DT training program is both feasible and acceptable for older adults at risk of falling and can be effectively delivered beyond clinical settings. Community-based recruitment outperformed NHS pathways, highlighting the value of community engagement. These findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a full-scale trial, with targeted refinements to recruitment, support structures, and delivery to maximize scalability and impact.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsExercise TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAging in PlaceDual-Task TestsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsPostural Balanceagingcognitiondual-taskexercisefalls preventionolder adultstechnology

Identifiers

PMID42150160
PMCPMC13183345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.