ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Efficacy and Safety of Traditional Chinese Medicine Exercise Versus Oral Medication in the Treatment of Neck Pain: Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neck pain poses a significant and growing public health challenge, with rising prevalence among younger populations and negative impacts on both quality of life and socioeconomic costs. Clinical manifestations are diverse, including restricted movement, muscle spasms, headaches, and upper limb numbness. Although drug therapy is widely used, its long-term use is limited by adverse effects. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) exercises offer a promising alternative, but high-quality evidence directly comparing their efficacy and safety to oral medications is currently lacking. Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TCM exercises and oral medication in treating neck pain. Methods: We will identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through a systematic search of multiple databases (including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], Chinese Biomedical Literature Database [CBM], VIP, and Wanfang) from inception through September 2025. Only RCTs directly comparing TCM exercise to oral medication will be included. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and the overall evidence will be graded via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. For heterogeneity, the I² statistic and Cochran Q test will be applied. A fixed-effect model will be adopted if I²<50% and P≥.10; otherwise, subgroup analysis will be performed. Should heterogeneity persist, sensitivity analysis or a random-effects model will be employed, leading to a reduction in the GRADE rating. Results: This is a study protocol; therefore, no results are available at this stage. The systematic review is scheduled to commence in August 2025, with the literature search from August to September 2025, study screening from September to December 2025, data extraction and analysis from January to May 2026, and manuscript submission by June 2026. Conclusions: This protocol outlines a systematic review and meta-analysis designed to compare the efficacy and safety of TCM exercises versus oral medications for neck pain. The completed review aims to synthesize the available evidence and clarify whether TCM exercises offer a comparable or superior alternative to pharmacotherapy. By systematically evaluating direct head-to-head RCTs, this study seeks to provide evidence-based insights to inform clinical decision-making. Potential limitations of the forthcoming review may include heterogeneity in exercise protocols, challenges in blinding, and a possible limited number or geographic concentration of available trials, which could affect the generalizability of the findings. These limitations will be considered when interpreting the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.