SynthesisJCO precision oncology2026
Systematic Review: Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers in Wilms Tumors.
Synthesis in JCO precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMolecular biomarkers are increasingly used for risk stratification, particularly in up-front surgery settings (Children's Oncology Group trials), whereas in preoperative chemotherapy setting, the ongoing International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP)-Renal Tumor Study Group-2016 UMBRELLA study aims to validate selected biomarkers for future risk-adapted treatment strategies. This systematic review summarizes all literature on the prognostic value of these biomarkers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature review (PubMed and Embase; up to January 2025) included studies with ≥50 de novo Wilms tumors (WTs). Eligible biomarkers included copy number variations; 1q gain, 1p and/or 16q loss of heterozygosity (LOH)/loss, 12 gain, 14q loss, 22 loss, 11p15 LOH/loss of imprinting (LOI), and structural somatic variants (
resultsLow-bias multivariable/stratified analyses identified 1q gain as worse EFS and 1p and/or 16q LOH/loss as worse EFS/OS prognostic factors, in up-front nephrectomy settings. Preoperative chemotherapy settings revealed similar trends with lacking significance.
conclusion1q gain and 1p and/or 16q LOH/loss emerge as independent prognostic biomarkers in up-front nephrectomy settings. Evidence remains limited in preoperative chemotherapy settings, particularly when using SIOP-oriented treatment algorithms. Prognostic value of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.