ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2026
Suboptimal Neural Drive for Muscle Output During Exertional Hyperthermia: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.
Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeExertional hyperthermia impairs endurance performance. Although the central nervous system mediates premature fatigue, limited understanding of when and how neural perturbations arise during exertional hyperthermia hinders efforts to develop effective strategies to mitigate its impacts.
methodsFifteen physically active males completed a familiarization trial and three randomized crossover controlled trials involving treadmill walking at 54 ± 4% maximal oxygen consumption (mean ± SD) in a temperate environment (COOL; dry bulb temperature [Tdb]: 22.3 ± 0.4°C, relative humidity [RH]: 68 ± 10%), warm environment with (WARM+FC; Tdb: 32.0 ± 0.2°C, RH: 71 ± 2%) and without (WARM; Tdb: 32.1 ± 0.2°C, RH: 70 ± 2%) isolated facial fan cooling, until volitional exhaustion or rectal temperature of 39.5°C. Brachioradialis activation was assessed via electromyography (EMG) through maximal (MVC) and submaximal (sMVC) voluntary isometric handgrip contractions. Primary motor cortex oxygenation was continuously monitored using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Δ[Hbdiff] (difference between oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin changes) indexed cortical activation. Δ[Hbdiff]/EMG quantified cortical activation relative to muscle activation.
resultsΔ[Hbdiff]/EMG was higher during MVC in WARM relative to COOL (P < 0.05) but similar across trials during sMVC. This was observed alongside reduced muscle activation (P < 0.05). Isolated facial cooling in WARM+FC trials did not mitigate heat-induced neural deficits observed during MVC.
conclusionsGreater cortical activation is required to sustain similar muscle activation during exercise in warm compared with temperate conditions, suggesting a suboptimal neural drive for muscle output with exertional hyperthermia. This may contribute to the onset and development of central fatigue. fNIRS-derived markers may serve as early indicators to mitigate heat-induced deficits and enhance safety during exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.