Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42150097›Full record

ArticleCardiology in review2026

Machine Learning in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Phenotyping, Mechanism Discovery, and Clinical Applications.

Kwaku Quansah, Emma Anderson, Esther Kwon, Chulan Kwon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology in review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kwaku QuansahFrom the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Cardio Science, Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Emma Anderson
Esther Kwon
Chulan Kwon

Funding

Microphysiological Model of Human Cardiac Sympathetic InnervationR01HL164936 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, DEOK-HO, KWON, CHULAN · 2022 to 2025
$3.2M
Targeting Dysregulated Maturation Program in PSC-CardiomyocytesR01HL171205 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Chulan Kwon · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 23IPA1051956NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL164936NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL171205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) refers to a heterogeneous group of myocardial disorders whose shared phenotypes complicate diagnosis and risk stratification. This complexity has driven growing interest in computational approaches that can integrate high-dimensional data and capture patterns not evident through conventional analyses. In this review, we synthesize studies, published between 2020 and 2026, that apply machine learning and deep learning models to NICMs across 3 interconnected domains: phenotype classification, mechanism discovery, and clinical decision support. We find that imaging and electrocardiography-based models help improve subtype discrimination, arrhythmia detection, and early disease identification; genomic and multiomics approaches advance variant interpretation and biomarker discovery; and emerging multimodal frameworks extend these efforts toward outcome prediction and individualized management. Challenges remain in generalizability, interpretability, and prospective validation, as well as in integrating modalities into patient-level risk models. Continued development of multimodal and longitudinal approaches will be essential for translating these advances into precision care for NICM.

Indexed as

biomarker discoveryclinical applicationdeep learningmachine learningnonischemic cardiomyopathyomics

Identifiers

PMID42150097
PMCPMC13186114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.