Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42150071›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Position-dependent feedback drives scaling and robustness of morphogen gradients.

Lewis Scott Mosby, Zena Hadjivasiliou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lewis Scott MosbyMathematical and Physical Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-1654-0494
Zena HadjivasiliouMathematical and Physical Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-1421

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) NAUKRI | Medical Research Council (MRC) NAWellcome Trust (WT) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental patterning is remarkably robust to intrinsic and extrinsic variation. Morphogen gradients are a key mechanism driving patterning, and themselves often scale with the size of developing tissues and exhibit robustness to other perturbations. Recent data indicate that expander molecules, thought to drive morphogen scaling through expansion-repression (ER) feedback, have concentration profiles that are position dependent. This challenges the currently accepted ER mechanism that requires uniform expander concentrations and position independent feedback. To reconcile these observations, we introduce an ER motif that supports morphogen scaling with both uniform and position-dependent expander concentrations. We quantify scaling as a function of position, and demonstrate that the spatial profiles of scaling and robustness to perturbations in morphogen production are highly correlated. In contrast to uniform expander concentrations that can confer high levels of scaling and robustness at a single position, position-dependent expander concentrations can enhance both scaling and robustness throughout the entire target tissue. We explore trade-offs associated with the dynamic range of the expander concentration, revealing that it can be varied to tune the locations where morphogen gradients confer scaling, robustness, and precision simultaneously. These findings offer insight into how developmental systems balance competing demands to achieve reproducible patterning despite biological variability.

Indexed as

Body PatterningFeedback, PhysiologicalModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisAnimalsGene Expression Regulation, Developmentalfeedbackmorphogenspatterningrobustnessscaling

Identifiers

PMID42150071
PMCPMC13214045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.