Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42150065›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Reversing the great degradation of nature by reducing factors related to cropland expansion.

Stephen Polasky, Erik Nelson, David Tilman, James Gerber, Justin Andrew Johnson, Erwin Corong, Forest Isbell, Jason Hill, Craig Packer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reversing the great degradation of nature by reducing factors related to cropland expansion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen PolaskyDept. Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0003-4934-2434
Erik NelsonDept. Economics, Bowdoin College, Brunswick, ME 04011-8497.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-5192
David TilmanDept. Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0001-6395-7676
James GerberProject Drawdown, St. Paul, MN 55101.
Justin Andrew JohnsonDept. Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Erwin CorongCenter for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Forest IsbellDept. Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-769X
Jason HillDept. Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-6713
Craig PackerDept. Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.ORCID 0000-0002-3939-8162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the main causes of habitat loss, agricultural cropland expansion is a major threat to biodiversity. We analyze past and anticipated future trends in population, per capita crop demand, and crop yield to estimate agricultural cropland requirements globally by 2050 and 2100, assuming moderate levels of climate change. According to a model of "business as usual," higher-income countries would be expected to show little or no net growth in cropland by the end of the century whereas cropland area could nearly double in lower-income countries. We consider two strategies to reduce global cropland expansion: decreasing per capita crop demand in higher-income countries by eating healthier diets, reducing food waste, and reducing biofuel production, and accelerating economic development in lower-income countries. Economic development in lower-income countries could reduce future cropland requirements via slower population growth, improved crop yield, and higher volumes of global crop trade, which could more than offset rising per capita crop demand. These impacts would far exceed reductions in cropland requirements from decreased crop demand in higher-income countries. Further, by combining accelerated economic development in lower-income countries with reduced crop demand in higher-income countries in tandem with reduced trade friction, global cropland requirements could shrink dramatically by the year 2100. Although economic growth is often considered to work in opposition to environmental conservation, accelerating economic development in lower-income countries would not only help alleviate poverty but could also confer benefits for biodiversity and global climate change.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesCrops, AgriculturalBiodiversityBiofuelsClimate ChangeEconomic DevelopmentEcosystemHumansBiofuelsagricultural land requirementsbiodiversityclimate changecrop yieldsper capita food consumption

Identifiers

PMID42150065
PMCPMC13214005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.