ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2026
Utilization and Performance of a Rapid Treponemal Antibody Test for Diagnosis of Syphilis in a High-Risk Population at an Urban County Hospital.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRapid detection of syphilis infection enables timely antibiotic treatment to prevent long-term complications and further transmission. We implemented a treponemal rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic test that was performed by trained clinical laboratory personnel on a 24/7 basis in an urban county hospital.
methodsFrom March 2023 to February 2024, 461 rapid syphilis tests (RSTs) were performed on serum from 449 patients. Specimens were also tested by a conventional reverse algorithm beginning with an enzyme immunoassay, followed by a rapid plasma reagin test, and when necessary, an additional treponemal test to resolve discordant results.
resultsMost patients (349, 77.7%) initially presented to the emergency department. The most common patient risk factors for syphilis were substance use disorder (51.9%) and unstable housing (42.8%). Compared with the reverse algorithm, rapid syphilis test (RST) sensitivity was 52.2%, specificity 98.2%, positive predictive value 83.7%, and negative predictive value 92.1%. After excluding 45 patients who had a documented prior history of syphilis, RST sensitivity was 83.3%, specificity 98.2%, positive predictive value 74.1%, and negative predictive value 99.0%. Nearly all of the 33 patients testing negative by the RST but positive by enzyme immunoassay were more likely to have been treated for a previous infection: 27 had a documented history of treatment, and 30 had undetectable or low rapid plasma reagin titers (≤1:2). The median RST turnaround time was 1.6 hours compared with 197.8 hours for reverse algorithm screening.
conclusionsRST is a useful option for high-risk patients in urban settings. Other testing methods are preferable for previously treated syphilis, and conventional follow-up testing is required to confirm results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.