ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Host-virus association databases as tools for understanding viral spillover at varying scales.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large host-virus association databases are increasingly used to explore broad questions in disease ecology, particularly around host range, pathogen diversity, and the potential for spillover. While these databases have been instrumental in large-scale synthesis of host-pathogen biogeography and zoonotic risk, their potential role in addressing fine-scale questions about pathogen prevalence, maintenance, and transmission dynamics remains underexplored. In this study, we build on previous efforts to assess how different types of data, including both entries in databases and the original studies they draw from, can support targeted research on zoonotic spillover. We selected two zoonotic diseases, Ebola virus disease and Lassa fever, which are characterised by recurrent spillover events and outbreaks in sub-Saharan Africa. We searched the VIRION database for entries corresponding to the respective viral taxa, the genus Orthoebolavirus and the species Mammarenavirus lassaense, and used these entries as case studies. We evaluated the extent to which databases capture crucial contextual metadata, such as spatial and temporal resolution, negative results, and measures of viral load. Guided by a conceptual framework of factors that lead to spillover, we demonstrate that while host-virus databases are valuable for addressing high-level patterns, fine-scale investigations of spillover require specific studies with detailed epidemiological data. Our study adds to a growing body of literature offering practical recommendations for database users and managers and highlights how these tools can be used as starting points in spillover research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.