ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
The speed limit of visual perception: Bidirectional influence of image memorability and processing speed on perceived duration and recognition.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual stimuli are known to vary in their perceived duration, with some stimuli engendering so-called "time dilation" and others "time compression" effects, in which stimuli appear to last for relatively longer or shorter durations, respectively. Extant theories have suggested these effects rely on the level of attention devoted to stimuli, the magnitude of the stimulus, or the intensity of the neural response, yet none of these can fully account for the observed effects. Recently, we demonstrated that perceived time is dilated by the memorability of an image (Ma, et al. 2024). To explain the memorability effect, we found that a recurrent convolutional neural network (rCNN) could recapitulate the time dilation effect by indexing the rate of entropy decline, or "speed", across successive timesteps, with more memorable images associated with faster speeds. Here, we replicate and extend these findings by applying this model to a wider array of images and testing three groups of subjects (n = 20ea.) on images sampled according to their speed, memorability, or both. We found that images that increased in speed, but with constant memorability, or images that increased in memorability, but with constant speed, both dilated perceived time, and further found that speed alone could induce a shift in 24h memory recognition performance of ~17%. However, we also found that images with very fast speeds exhibited an opposite, time compression effect. These findings can be explained by a simple inverted-U model between speed and perceived duration that scales with the memorability of the image. Overall, our findings provide the boundaries of speed and memorability effects on time perception, suggesting the visual system dilates time when presented with informative stimuli but compresses it when these stimuli become overwhelmingly complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.