ArticlePloS one2026
Attack and defense networks in a student social system.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Signed networks are a tool that researchers use to study the relationships between individuals in a complex system. Many studies focus on negative relationships and how these shape the structure of complex networks. Negative hubs, or nodes with the most negative connections, are of particular interest to researchers, as they help us understand social phenomena such as bullying, cyberbullying, and mental health. In this work, we study directed signed networks that represent positive (friendship) and negative (enmity) relationships between students of different academic levels. We propose a systematic methodology to obtain and analyze the networks of nine schools (∼4,300 students) in Yucatán, México. We introduce attack and defense subnetworks constructed from nodes with high out-negative and in-negative degree, respectively, and examine whether these subnetworks exhibit similar structural properties. Using the Leiden algorithm, we detected directed signed communities and compared the community structure of the attack and defense networks. We also calculated social balance theory measures and discussed the outcomes we obtained. We identify a range within which the definition of attack and defense networks is structurally meaningful. We have observed that the structural properties of attack and defense networks are similar and that they are not mutually exclusive, with an average of 60% common nodes, indicating a strong overlap between the two networks. Also, we have evaluated the attack and defense networks in relation to the gender of students, and found that female networks were generally denser across schools. Finally, we discuss the conceptual relationship between these networks and bullying-related roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.